A practical guide to growing mushrooms in IndiaA joint educational initiative by MushroomWale & DMR Solan
MushroomFarming.in

A joint educational initiative by

MushroomWale.com
ICAR–Directorate of Mushroom Research, Solan logoICAR–DMRSolan

Mushroom disease library · Field companion

Disease picture reference

Real research photographs with attribution, host context and lookalike warnings. Generated teaching scenes are never presented as pathogen evidence.

Real symptoms, with the original context

Compare structure, location and progression—not just colour. These images are from published research, not our farm cases. Some are experimentally induced symptoms. Captions identify that distinction. Tap a source to inspect its full figure and methods.

Brown bacterial blotch in button mushrooms

Research reference: brown surface blotching on a naturally affected mature Button mushroom, Huang et al. Figure 1b.
Published research photographPanel 1b, natural symptoms. Display cropped; no symptom retouching.Huang, Huang, Nie & Liu (2024), Figure 1b, Phytopathology Research 6:21CC BY 4.0Panel b shows naturally affected mature Button mushrooms from the study in Guangxi, China, not an Indian farm or an inoculation experiment.

Look for: Tan to brown cap lesions, sometimes becoming darker or sunken.

Do not confuse with: Bruising after handling, fungal lesions and chemical injury.

Read checks and response →

Brown blotch in oyster mushrooms

Published comparison of experimentally inoculated Pleurotus caps in panels A1–C1 and water-treated controls in A2–C2.
Published research figure · open image to inspectControlled experiment, not a natural farm case. A1–C1: bacterial challenge; A2–C2: water controls. Different Pleurotus strains are compared.Okorley et al. (2019), Pathogens 8:227, Figure 1CC BY 4.0 · WebP conversion only; no symptom retouching

Look for: Pale brown patches becoming darker or depressed.

Do not confuse with: Dry edges, bruising, age-related yellowing and other bacterial rots.

Read checks and response →

Morel red-stipe / bacterial-disease investigation

Published morel study showing affected collected fruit bodies in panel A and bacterial culture isolates in panels B and C.
Published research figure · original study contextPanel A is the affected M. sextelata material collected in the cited Gansu study. B–C are laboratory cultures, not crop surfaces. The small original photograph cannot be used to judge subtle colour changes or diagnose an Indian crop.Zhu et al. (2023), Frontiers in Microbiology, Figure 1CC BY 4.0 · WebP conversion only; no symptom retouching
Inspect the complete figure ↗: Zhu et al. (2023), Frontiers in Microbiology, Figure 1

Look for: Abnormal red-stipe appearance in the reported syndrome.

Do not confuse with: Abiotic injury, ageing and fungal or secondary decay.

Read checks and response →

Oyster mushroom viruses

Published oyster-virus figure with normal and malformed oyster clusters above laboratory detection and a genome diagram.
Published research figure · original study contextPanel a: P. ostreatus cultivar 8129, with normal comparison N and field-collected malformed clusters 1–4. Panels b–c show the study’s laboratory evidence and genome schematic, not steps for home testing. Shape alone does not confirm a virus.Hu et al. (2022), Biology 11:574, Figure 1CC BY 4.0 · WebP conversion only; no symptom retouching
Inspect the complete figure ↗: Hu et al. (2022), Biology 11:574, Figure 1

Look for: Slower mycelial growth or abnormal fruiting in documented infected strains.

Do not confuse with: Old or damaged spawn, substrate failure and environmental stress.

Read checks and response →

Wet bubble

Research reference: a large malformed white mass with amber droplets, captioned as wet bubble in Gea et al. Figure 1c.
Published research photographPanel 1c, lower photograph. Display cropped; no symptom retouching.Gea, Navarro, Santos, Diánez & Carrasco (2021), Figure 1, Microorganisms 9:585CC BY 4.0The publication identifies crop symptoms in the lower row; the upper row contains cultures. Only the crop photograph is shown here.

Look for: Irregular fleshy growth with white surface growth early in development.

Do not confuse with: Dry bubble; early distorted tissue is not reliably separated by a casual photograph.

Read checks and response →

Cobweb disease

Research reference: white cottony growth spreading across mushrooms and casing, captioned as cobweb in Gea et al. Figure 1b.
Published research photographPanel 1b, lower photograph. Display cropped; no symptom retouching.Gea, Navarro, Santos, Diánez & Carrasco (2021), Figure 1, Microorganisms 9:585CC BY 4.0The publication identifies crop symptoms in the lower row; the upper row contains cultures. Only the crop photograph is shown here.

Look for: Expanding wispy or cottony patches crossing casing and mushroom surfaces.

Do not confuse with: Normal crop mycelium, Mucor-like growth and Syzygites.

Read checks and response →

Green mould in button compost

Research reference: green-sporulating growth in a Button mushroom crop, captioned as green mould in Gea et al. Figure 1d.
Published research photographPanel 1d, lower photograph. Display cropped; no symptom retouching.Gea, Navarro, Santos, Diánez & Carrasco (2021), Figure 1, Microorganisms 9:585CC BY 4.0The publication identifies crop symptoms in the lower row; the upper row contains cultures. Only the crop photograph is shown here.

Look for: White growth followed by green sporulation in compost or casing.

Do not confuse with: Penicillium, Aspergillus and other green-sporing contaminants.

Read checks and response →

Wood-ear brown rot

Published Auricularia cornea figure comparing healthy and diseased fresh and dried fruit bodies, greenhouse signs and laboratory evidence.
Published research figure · original study contextWhite A. cornea from the Chinese study. A–B: healthy fresh/dried material; C–D: affected fresh/dried material; E: greenhouse symptoms. F and H–I show culture or microscopy; G is an experimental challenge. These panels are not all natural farm cases.Ye et al. (2023), Frontiers in Microbiology, Figure 1CC BY 4.0 · WebP conversion only; no symptom retouching
Inspect the complete figure ↗: Ye et al. (2023), Frontiers in Microbiology, Figure 1

Look for: Abnormal browning accompanied by deterioration.

Do not confuse with: Normal brown pigmentation.

Read checks and response →

Morel white mould and fungal rot

Published multi-panel morel white-mould figure: field beds and affected fruit bodies above culture and microscope images.
Published research figure · original study contextA–D show affected young morels and collected material; the red arrows are from the original figure. E–F show further fruit-body observations. G is a culture; H–L are microscopy. Read the study’s panel descriptions; these are not a visual identification key.Wang et al. (2024), Journal of Fungi 10:604, Figure 1CC BY 4.0 · WebP conversion only; no symptom retouching
Inspect the complete figure ↗: Wang et al. (2024), Journal of Fungi 10:604, Figure 1

Look for: White surface growth on affected fruit bodies.

Do not confuse with: Water injury, secondary saprophytes and bacterial decay.

Read checks and response →

What a photograph cannot tell you

  • A green colony cannot distinguish all Trichoderma species from other green moulds.
  • A distorted mushroom cannot confirm a virus. Normal strain form and environmental conditions must be checked.
  • A normal-looking crop cannot rule out foodborne contamination.
  • Small organisms need identification: a mite or nematode may be harmful, neutral or beneficial.

Where a verified reusable image is unavailable, the condition page says so and links the research. We have not filled those gaps with synthetic pathogen photographs.

Illustrated field skills

Learn where to look—and what to record

These eight teaching plates explain anatomy, crop systems and observations. They are deliberately separate from the real research photographs above. Numbered details have readable explanations below each picture.

Read the bag before opening it

Teaching drawing of an intact straw bag: 1 closure, 2 illustrative green patch, 3 batch label.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographAn illustrative contamination pattern, not a verified Trichoderma photograph. Inspect through the intact bag. The mushroom and leaf drawings identify the teaching context, not a recommended placement of crops beside contaminated material.
  1. Closure and entry points

    Record whether the first change is near a seal, filter, tear or fruiting cut. Do not open the bag to investigate.

  2. Patch boundary

    Photograph its position and change over time. A green patch does not identify a genus or species; early growth may be white.

  3. Batch identity

    Keep spawn lot, substrate treatment, inoculation date and rack position together. Compare other bags from the same batch.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Read the bag before opening it
Read the related investigation guide →

Name the part that changed

Button mushroom anatomy drawing: 1 outer cap, 2 gills, 3 inner stem, 4 casing and compost boundary.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographA simplified Agaricus anatomy map, not a plate of diseased specimens. Gill colour changes with maturity. The cutaway explains location; it is not an instruction to cut suspect mushrooms in a crop room.
  1. Cap surface

    Record a local spot versus whole-cap colour, and whether it was present before picking.

  2. Gills underneath

    Separate normal maturity-related pigmentation from unusual wetness, exudate or deterioration.

  3. Inside the stem

    Internal changes can differ from the outside. Obtain sampling instructions before cutting suspect material.

  4. Casing and compost

    Note whether the change starts in the fruit body, the casing surface or the substrate below.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Name the part that changed
Read the related investigation guide →

Wet surfaces and dry edges tell different stories

Two illustrated moisture clues: 1 droplets on a button cap, 2 a dry cracked oyster mushroom edge.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographTwo different crops illustrate moisture observations—not healthy versus diseased controls. Neither droplets nor cracks establish an infectious cause.
  1. Surface water

    Record watering time, condensation and how long caps remain wet. Room relative humidity alone does not describe cap wetness.

  2. Drying and cracking

    Check where damage occurs and when it appeared. Compare airflow, water supply and maturity with a same-strain crop.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Wet surfaces and dry edges tell different stories
Read the related investigation guide →

Small organisms are not all the same

Illustrated broad organism groups: 1 gnat-like adult fly, 2 legless larva, 3 eight-legged mite, 4 nematode-like worm. Not to a shared scale.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographConceptual forms, not a species-identification key or a shared magnification. This plate does not depict every fly family, springtails or outdoor pests. Harmful and beneficial organisms can look similar.
  1. An adult fly

    Record where it is seen and whether it walks, runs or flies. Adult identification and larval damage are separate observations.

  2. A larval stage

    A gnat-like legless larva is shown. Do not assume that every pale organism in substrate is the same pest.

  3. A mite

    Mites may feed on crop tissue, mould or other organisms. Presence alone is not proof of crop damage.

  4. A nematode-like form

    Nematode groups have different roles. Microscopic examination and specialist identification may be necessary.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Small organisms are not all the same
Read the related investigation guide →

Compare the air, the substrate and the surface

Conceptual button-growing room with numbered air sensor, substrate probe and wall-condensation detail.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographA conceptual cutaway—not an engineered airflow plan, sensor-placement specification or setpoint recommendation. Button racks illustrate observation locations; other crop systems need their own arrangement.
  1. Room air

    Use time-stamped readings at representative positions. One sensor can miss a rack-level or doorway difference.

  2. Substrate

    Record substrate temperature separately from room air using the farm’s appropriate hygienic measurement procedure.

  3. Cold or wet surfaces

    Map condensation, leaks and wet crop zones. Compare the pattern with watering and temperature changes.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Compare the air, the substrate and the surface
Read the related investigation guide →

Find the problem in the correct growing system

Substrate comparison drawing: 1 casing, 2 colonised compost, 3 straw bag, 4 filter-patch wood-substrate block.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographA location map, not a substrate recipe, preparation protocol or guarantee of healthy material. Composted, pasteurised and sterilised systems are not interchangeable.
  1. Casing layer

    For crops that use casing, trace storage, handling and the casing lot separately from the compost.

  2. Compost below

    Compare the compost lot and preparation history. White growth is not, by itself, proof of either purity or contamination.

  3. Straw bag

    Record treatment, cooling, spawning and the first affected position through the intact bag.

  4. Wood-substrate block

    Check the filter, seal and batch history without opening suspect material. Normal block appearance depends on crop and stage.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Find the problem in the correct growing system
Read the related investigation guide →

Follow the culture from source to evidence

Illustrated evidence pathway: 1 labelled spawn bag, 2 differently shaped oyster clusters, 3 conceptual laboratory handoff.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographDifferent cluster shapes are not a virus test or proof of degeneration. The generic container and laboratory are symbols, not a sample-packing specification or an institutional endorsement.
  1. Trace the culture

    Keep the supplier, species, strain, spawn lot, receipt date and storage history.

  2. Compare like with like

    Compare the same strain and stage under recorded conditions. Natural strain variation can resemble a disorder.

  3. Ask before sampling

    Contact a qualified laboratory about the diagnostic question, accepted material and shipping instructions.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Follow the culture from source to evidence
Read the related investigation guide →

Look at the handling history as well as the crop

Postharvest observation drawing with numbered cap bruise, condensation inside packaging and a logger beside a batch tag.
AI-generated teaching illustration · not a diagnostic photographA teaching still life, not a recommended mixed-crop packing arrangement or food-safety clearance. Invisible contamination cannot be ruled out by an attractive appearance.
  1. Bruising or colour change

    Ask whether it appeared before picking, during handling or in storage. A brown area is not automatically bacterial blotch.

  2. Moisture inside a pack

    Record condensation, temperature changes and elapsed time. Do not use a visual match to release a suspect lot.

  3. Time, temperature and lot

    Link harvest, packing and transport records so affected produce can be traced and assessed.

Open illustration at full size ↗: Look at the handling history as well as the crop
Read the related investigation guide →

Teaching illustrations have a different job

Eight numbered observation plates and three workflow scenes explain anatomy, growing systems, moisture, pests, culture history, harvest handling, recording and separation of work areas. They do not establish a pathogen, identify every organism or prove that a building meets biosecurity requirements. A generated grower is not a real scientist or an institutional endorsement.

Learn to document your own crop →
← Back to the disease directory